Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

NELSON v. FLOYD.

         OPINION

         BY THE COURT.

         Appeals from an order granting a new trial. The decision and judgment, which the court set aside, were founded upon substantially conflicting evidence, bearing upon the main questions, as issue between the parties, as to the existence and extent of the subordinate claims and liens against the building in controversy; and as the court set the judgment aside and granted a new trial upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to justify them, this court, in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion, will not disturb the order. Guttierrez v. Brinkerhoff, 9 P. C. L. J. 734; Blum v. Sunol, 11 P. C. L. J. 275; Pierce v. Schaden, 55 Cal. 406; Bronner v. Wetzlar, Id. 419.

          Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Nelson v. Floyd
(Jun 13, 1884)