Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

L. L. BAKER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. M. EVERHART ET AL., RESPONDENTS

         OPINION          The further facts appear in the opinion of the court.

         THE COURT.

         The Superior Court did not have jurisdiction to make a decree discharging the alleged insolvents; the schedule was sworn to before a notary public, whereas section 4 of the Act of 1852 required it to be sworn to "before the judge having jurisdiction," etc.

         The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded, with instructions to render judgment for plaintiff on the findings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baker v. Everhart
(Feb 4, 1884)