Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SAMUEL BLOOM, RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, APPELLANT

         OPINION

         In Bank

         PER CURIAM.

         We think the city and county of San Francisco had such proprietorship of the city and county hospital as rendered it liable for damages in the case as presented in the transcript. We also think the claim of plaintiff was not a claim to be presented to the board of supervisors before an action could have been maintained.

         Judgment and order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bloom v. City & County of San Francisco
(Jan 29, 1884)