Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

TOWNSEND WOOD et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MONTEREY COUNTY, Respondent

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         Certiorari. In perfecting his appeal from the Justice's Court to the Superior Court, the appellant gave an undertaking. The adverse party excepted to the sufficiency of the sureties. Neither the sureties in the undertaking nor other sureties justified; but, instead thereof, the appellant filed a new undertaking with other sureties. In so doing he gave no notice as required by the last clause of section 978 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Such being the case, "the appeal must be regarded as if no such undertaking had been given." The statute is peremptory. Without the justification of the sureties named in the undertaking, or other sureties in their stead, upon notice to the adverse party, the appeal was not perfected, and the Superior Court has no jurisdiction of the case. The motion to dismiss the appeal should have been granted.

         The proceedings in the Superior Court are annulled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wood v. Superior Court
(Jun 4, 1885)