Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ARCATA AND MAD RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MURPHY et al., Appellants

         OPINION

         THE COURT

          [11 P. 882] Action to condemn land for a right of way for a railroad. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appealed.          Defendants were permitted to give and did give evidence as to the value of the land as a bridge site; therefore no error was committed in that regard of which the defendants can complain.

         The complaint was filed April 11, 1883. The trial was had June 5, 1883. The court instructed the jury to consider the market value of the land April 12, 1883. There was no evidence that there had been an increase in the intrinsic value of the land between the commencement of the action and the trial; therefore it is immaterial whether or not the instruction was correct in point of time.

         We see no error; the judgment and order are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Arcata & Mad River Railroad Co. v. Murphy
(Sep 28, 1886)