Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

GEORGE PARDY, Appellant, v. CHARLES MONTGOMERY et al., Respondents

         JUDGES: In Bank. Thornton, J. Searls, C. J., Works, J., Paterson, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          THORNTON, Judge

         We cannot take notice of the affidavits in the transcript, showing, as claimed by the appellant, the circumstances under which this action was dismissed by the court below, for the reason that it is not shown in any mode that such affidavits were used on the hearing of the application in that court.

         The court below had power to dismiss the action for want of prosecution (see Code Civ. Proc., sec. 581), and there being no showing to the contrary, we must presume that the court below exercised its power properly and within the rules prescribed by law.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Pardy v. Montgomery
(Nov 2, 1888)