Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

JOHN H. WISE et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE GRIFFITH et al., Appellants

         JUDGES: In Bank. Thornton, J. Paterson, J., McFarland, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          THORNTON, Judge

         [20 P. 676] We find no error in this record. The evidence of Casey was properly admitted.

         Defendant Heuston became a purchaser of the mortgaged property pendente lite, with actual notice of the pendency of this action to foreclose the mortgage made by the defendants, Griffith and wife.

         We cannot see how the plaintiffs' action against Heuston is barred. He never was a necessary party to the action, but as purchaser with actual notice of the pendency of plaintiffs' action to foreclose he would have been bound by the decree against the Griffiths.

         Judgment and order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wise v. Griffith
(Jan 25, 1889)