Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARY E. FLASHNER, Appellant, v. DAVID V. WALDRON, Respondent

         JUDGES: Paterson, J. Works, J., and Fox, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          PATERSON, Judge

         The court below granted a motion for nonsuit, and judgment followed [24 P. 1064] for the defendant. The plaintiff took no exception to the ruling. It is claimed that no exception was necessary, but it has been several times decided that an error in granting a nonsuit is an error in law, and must be excepted to. It is unnecessary, therefore, for us to consider the argument of counsel for appellant in support of his contention that the order granting a nonsuit is an order "finally determining the rights of the parties," and "deemed to have been excepted to," under section 647 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Flashner v. Waldron
(Oct 25, 1890)