Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

GEORGE T. MARSH, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent

         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT          The petition herein is insufficient to authorize the issuance of the writ asked for.

         The petition does not show that the order of the superior court removing B. T. Whiteside from the position of assignee or trustee, under the deed of assignment executed for the benefit of the creditors of the insolvent firm of Blum, Eppstein & Co., was made without notice to Whiteside.

         The averment that the petition filed in the superior court, asking for the removal of said Whiteside, contained "no allegations of any legal cause why said Whiteside should be removed," is but the statement of a conclusion of law, and is not equivalent to a direct allegation [26 P. 963] that said petition did not charge that said Whiteside had violated or was unfit to execute the duties of trustee under said deed of assignment.

         Application for writ denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Marsh v. Superior Court
(Apr 13, 1891)