Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PARKER DEAR, Appellant, v. H. W. WEINEKE, Respondent

         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

          [29 P. 647] This action was brought to recover certain taxes claimed to have been paid under duress, and which it is declared by the appellant were not collectible, by reason of the assessment being invalid.

         The individual whose personal property was assessed gave a list of it in detail, as he states in his complaint, to the assessor, but that official did not list the property in detail, but made this entry in the assessment-book: "Value of personal property, exclusive of money and solvent credits, $ 15,725."

         The complaint is demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff not desiring to amend his complaint, judgment passed for the defendant, from which the present appeal is prosecuted.

         The only question involved is, whether the form of the assessment set out in the assessor's book was sufficient, under section 3650 of the Political Code; and that it was sufficient is, in effect, decided in San Francisco v. Pennie , 93 Cal. 465, and upon the authority of that case the judgment must be affirmed.

         Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Dear v. Weineke
(Apr 11, 1892)