Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARK WALSER, Appellant, v. R. H. AUSTIN, Auditor of Fresno County, Respondent

         JUDGES: De Haven, J. Fitzgerald, J., concurred. McFarland, J., concurs.

         OPINION

          DE HAVEN, Judge

         It was held in the case of Welsh v. Bramlet , 98 Cal. 219, that subdivision 21 of section 170 of the County Government Act, approved March 31, 1891 (Stats. 1891, p. 295), contains local and special legislation, and is in conflict with section 5 of article XI of the constitution of the state, which directs that the legislature by general and uniform laws shall provide for the election or appointment in the several counties of such county, township, and municipal officers "as public convenience may require, and shall prescribe their duties and fix their terms of [37 P. 870] office." We can add nothing to the reasoning by which that conclusion was reached, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order herein must be affirmed.

         Judgment and order affirmed.

         CONCUR

          McFARLAND

         McFarland, J. I concur in the judgment solely upon the authority of Welsh v. Bramlet , 98 Cal. 219, and Dougherty v. Austin , 94 Cal. 601, in which cases I could not concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Walser v. Austin
(Sep 17, 1894)