Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

J. W. FALKNER, E. T. STEEN (Substituted), Respondent, v. JOSHUA HENDY et al., Appellants

107 Cal. 49 40 P. 21 J. W. FALKNER, E. T. STEEN (Substituted), Respondent, v. JOSHUA HENDY et al., Appellants No. 15644 Supreme Court of California May 4, 1895

         107 Cal. 49 at 54. Rehearing Denied.

         Original Opinion of April 4, 1895, Reported at 107 Cal. 49.

         OPINION

         THE COURT          A petition for a modification of the judgment having been filed, the following opinion was rendered thereon on the 4th of May, 1895:

         The Court.

         Respondent asks us to so modify the judgment herein as to give express direction that the cause be remanded for a new trial.

         Such modification is unnecessary, since the effect of the unqualified reversal is to remand the cause for a new trial. (Stearns v. Aguirre , 7 Cal. 443; Argenti v. San Francisco , 30 Cal. 459; Ryan v. Tomlinson , 39 Cal. 639.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Falkner v. Hendy
(May 4, 1895)