Page __
__ Cal.3d __
279 Cal.Rptr. 777, 807 P.2d 1006
Charles Patrick WOOSLEY, Respondent,
v.
STATE of California et al., Appellants.
No. S014557.
Supreme Court of California
March 28, 1991
Prior Report: Cal.App., 269 Cal.Rptr. 767.
Upon motion of respondent Woosley as class representative, filed August 24, 1990, the order granting review in this case, and specifying issues to be argued, is hereby modified to permit the parties to argue the question of whether the practices of the Department of Motor Vehicles in registering, titling and licensing of vehicles unlawfully discriminated against vehicles acquired outside of the State of California, in violation of the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States and California Constitutions.
Respondent class representative having already briefed this issue, appellants State of California et al. are granted 20 days from the date of this order in which to file a supplemental reply brief limited to this issue.
The motion (filed August 23, 1990) of respondent Woosley as class representative to strike specified portions of appellants' opening brief is denied.
The application (filed February 7, 1991) of respondent Woosley in his individual capacity to strike portions of appellants' reply brief and the amicus curiae brief of the County Supervisors' Association of California is denied.
The request (filed September 4, 1990) by amicus curiae County Supervisors' Association of California that the court take judicial notice of documents attached to that request relating to Senate Bill 417 of the 1977 legislative session, is granted.