Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Elias GOMEZ-SERRANO, aka Raul Romero-Gomez, aka Francisco Gonzalez-Garcia, aka Jose Arzate-Osorio, aka Elias Serrano-Gomez, aka Ramiro Pineda-Gomez, Defendant--Appellant.

42 Fed.Appx. 940 (9th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Elias GOMEZ-SERRANO, aka Raul Romero-Gomez, aka Francisco Gonzalez-Garcia, aka Jose Arzate-Osorio, aka Elias Serrano-Gomez, aka Ramiro Pineda-Gomez, Defendant--Appellant. No. 01-50185. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 1, 2002

Submitted July 22, 2002.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-00-00098-DOC-1.

Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Elias Gomez-Serrano appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of

Page 941.

8 U.S.C. § 1326. Gomez-Serrano's counsel has filed a motion pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Gomez-Serrano has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. Gomez-Serrano
(Aug 1, 2002)