Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID THOMAS HAWKINS, Defendant and Appellant.

Page 284g

109 Cal.App.4th 284g —Cal.Rptr.2d— THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID THOMAS HAWKINS, Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B156481 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Sixth Division June 2, 2003

        Los Angeles County, Super. Ct. No. PA037091

        THE COURT.—It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 6, 2003, be modified as follows:

        1. On page 2, lines 9 and 10 [108 Cal.App.4th 529, advance report, 2d par., lines 12-13], the sentence stating "We conclude that credits are to be awarded under section 2933" is modified to read as follows:

        We conclude that credits are to be awarded under sections 2933 and 4019.

        There is no change in the judgment.

        Respondent's petition for rehearing is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Hawkins
(Jun 2, 2003)