Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CATHEDRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. STICKLES.

Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 70, 130 P.3d 931 CATHEDRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. STICKLES. No. S140544. Supreme Court of California March 1, 2006

         Prior report: Cal.App., 36 Cal.Rptr.3d 833.

         Review granted/briefing deferred (rule 29.1).

         Petition for review granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Mt. San Jacinto Comm. College Dist. v. Azusa Pacific University, S132251 and San Diego Metropolitan Transit Bd. v. RV Communities, S133786 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 29.1, is deferred pending further order of the court.

         GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Cathedral City Redevelopment Agency v. Stickles
(Mar 1, 2006)