Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re BRIAN S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NICHOLAS S., Defendant and Appellant.

In re BRIAN S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NICHOLAS S., Defendant and Appellant. B202272 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Seventh Division June 2, 2008

         NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

         Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CK 67315

          ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; CHANGE IN JUDGMENT; PETITION FOR REHEARING DENIED

         THE COURT

         It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 13, 2008, and not certified for publication, be modified as follows:

         On the title page, replace the word “affirmed” with “affirmed as modified.”

         On page 2, first paragraph, the last sentence reads “We affirm.” It should read: “We affirm as modified.”

         On page 10, at the end of the first full paragraph (starting with The Department concedes), a sentence should be added stating: “Accordingly, the court is directed to strike the section 300, subdivision (j) finding.”

         On page 14, the disposition should read: “The order is affirmed as modified. The juvenile court is directed to strike the section 300, subdivision (j) jurisdictional finding.”

         The foregoing does effect a change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Brian S.
(Jun 2, 2008)