Mango v. City of Maywood

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

CV 11-5641-GW(FFMx)

Attorney(S)

For David Mango, Plaintiff: Cindy Panuco, Mary Tanagho Ross, Hadsell Stormer Richardson and Renick LLP, Pasadena, CA; Dan Stormer, Hadsell Stormer and Renick LLP, Pasadena, CA; Scott Robert Ames, Law Offices of Scott R Ames, PC, Los Angeles, CA. For City of Maywood, a municipal corporation, Edward Varela, in his official capacity, Veronica Guardado, in her official capacity, Felipe Aguirre, individually, Thomas Martin, in his official capacity, Ana Rosa Rizo, individually, Defendants: Elizabeth M Kessel, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kessel and Associates, Los Angeles, CA; Armineh Megrabyan, Kessel and Associates, Los Angeles, CA. For City of Bell, a municipal corporation, Defendant, Cross Defendant: Gina K Chung, Glen E Tucker, Aleshire and Wynder LLP, El Segundo, CA. For Lilian Myers, individually, Lilian Myers, in her official capacity, Edward Varela, individually, Veronica Guardado, individually, Felipe Aguirre, in his official capacity, Thomas Martin, individually, Ana Rosa Rizo, in her official capacity, City of Maywood, a municipal corporation, Defendants: Elizabeth M Kessel, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kessel and Associates, Los Angeles, CA; Armineh Megrabyan, Kessel and Associates, Los Angeles, CA; Steve Alan Filarsky, Filarsky & Watt, Manhattan Beach, CA.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Title David Mango v. City of Maywood, et al

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A COURT ORDER

On November 13, 2014, the Court issued an Order re Attorney Consent to E-Service of Documents. [Doc. No. 153] Defendants' counsel, Steve Alan Filarsky, has failed to respond and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders Mr. Filarsky to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to respond to a court order (" OSC"). The OSC hearing is set on December 11, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.

Mr. Filarsky is advised that if he consents to e-service by December 11, 2014 or otherwise shows good cause for his failure to respond to a court order, the OSC hearing will be vacated and no appearance will be required.

Title David Mango v. City of Maywood, et al

Comments