Ludwigsen v. NPL Construction Co.

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14-cv-04104 JCS

Attorney(S)

PAUL V. SIMPSON, H. ANN LIROFF, SARAH E. LUCAS, SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI, Professional Corporation South San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Gifford Ludwigsen, SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C., Attorney for Defendant NPL Construction Co.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

14-cv-04104 JCS

Attorney(S)

PAUL V. SIMPSON, H. ANN LIROFF, SARAH E. LUCAS, SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI, Professional Corporation South San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff. Gifford Ludwigsen, SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C., Attorney for Defendant NPL Construction Co.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

GIFFORD LUDWIGSEN, Plaintiff, v. NPL CONSTRUCTION CO., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT NPL CONSTRUCTION CO. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

JOSEPH C. SPERO, District Judge.

Defendant NPL Construction Co. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Gifford Ludwigsen ("Plaintiff"), by and through his attorneys of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to November 7, 2014. This agreement will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

GIFFORD LUDWIGSEN, Plaintiff, v. NPL CONSTRUCTION CO., a Nevada Corporation, Defendant.

Comments