United States v. Western Surety Co.

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

2:15-cv-01168 DAD

Attorney(S)

Garret D. Murai, WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Real Party in Interest LOZANO CONSTRUCTION. FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP, Christopher R. Sillari, Attorneys for Defendants, WESTERN SURETY COMPANY and CREW MW II, LP.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of Lozano Construction, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation; CREW MW II, LP, a Nevada limited partnership; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff LOZANO CONSTRUCTION and Defendants WESTERN SURETY COMPANY and CREW MW II, LP, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. The parties are in the process of settling this matter and have circulated a settlement agreement.

2. To permit time for the terms of the settlement to be complied with, the parties request that Court continue the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for Friday, October 16, 2015 and associated dates until a date convenient to the Court but no earlier than November 16, 2015.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for Friday, October 16, 2015 is continued to Friday, November 20, 2015. Both parties shall file and serve status reports on or before November 16, 2015.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of Lozano Construction, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation; CREW MW II, LP, a Nevada limited partnership; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Comments