Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Cary L. BANEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT, Tory D. Bernsen, 8008 Carondelet Avenue, Suite 311, St. Louis, MO 63105.

For Respondent, Eric Schmitt, Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Cary L. Baney ("Movant") appeals from the Circuit Court of Montgomery County’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was found guilty on February 16, 2016 of deviate sexual assault of C.P. ("Victim"), in violation of Section 566.070 RSMo. On May 4, 2016, Movant was sentenced to five years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. This Court affirmed Movant’s conviction on direct appeal. See State v. Baney, 516 S.W.3d 410 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017).

All rule reference are to Mo. Sup. Ct. R.

All statutory citations are to the RSMo. (2000) unless otherwise indicated. Movant’s offense was transferred in 2013 and has since been codified at Section 566.061 RSMo., as second-degree sodomy.
--------

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baney v. State
(Dec 3, 2019)