Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Penny OUDHEUSDEN v. Peter OUDHEUSDEN

Scott T. Garosshen and Kenneth J. Bartschi, in support of the petition.

Yakov Pyetranker, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 190 Conn. App. 169, 209 A.3d 1282 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had erroneously engaged in ‘double dipping" by awarding the plaintiff alimony from income generated by the defendant's businesses and also awarding the plaintiff a percentage of those businesses in its division of property?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had abused its discretion by failing to enter financial orders that equitably divided the marital estate?"

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden
(Jun 26, 2019)