Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

AZMI TAKIEDINE, Plaintiff v. 7-ELEVEN, INC, Defendant

GENE E.K. PRATTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

ORDER

GENE E.K. PRATTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

AND NOW, this 17th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 157), 7-Eleven's Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 158), Plaintiff Azmi Takiedine's Response in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 167, 169), and 7-Eleven's Reply (Doc. No. 172), for the reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that 7-Eleven's Motion (Doc. No. 157) is GRANTED.

AND upon consideration of Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.'s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert (Doc. No. 163), Plaintiff Azmi Takiedine's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 168), and 7-Eleven's Reply (Doc. No. 175), it is ORDERED that 7-Eleven's Motion (Doc. No. 163) is DEEMED MOOT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Takiedine v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
(May 1, 2022)