RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendants Shenzhen Absen Optoelectronic Co., Ltd. and Absen, Inc. (collectively, “Absen”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Hall Patents (Dkt. No. 437.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 640), recommending denial of Absen's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Hall Patents. Absen has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 650.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Hall Patents, the Report and Recommendation, and Absen's Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Absen's Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Hall Patents (Dkt. No. 437) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.