AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Larry E. GROMER and Terry D. Hoppenthaler, Successor Trustees of the Ronald D. Gromer Trust Dated May 26, 2004, Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Beth C. Boggs, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Thomas E. Hankins, Gladstone, MO, Attorney for Appellants.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Larry E. Gromer and Terry D. Hoppenthaler, successor trustees of the Ronald D. Gromer Trust dated May 26, 2004 (collectively, "Gromer"), appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company on IDS's petition for declaratory judgment, which sought a declaration that IDS owed no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, Lutricia Cummings, for the $21,077.10 judgment entered against Cummings in favor of Gromer. Gromer raises a single point on appeal: the lower court erred in entering summary judgment in IDS's favor because IDS's policy either clearly favored coverage or was ambiguous and, therefore, had to be construed in favor of coverage. Finding no error, we affirm the grant of summary judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Gromer
(Nov 3, 2020)