AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CHARLES FORSYTH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE0

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DOCKET NO. 43

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE0

On December 7, 2021, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiffs response was due by December 21, 2021. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition brief Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by no later than January 14, 2022 why the Court should not dismiss his claims for lack of prosecution or grant Defendants' motion as unopposed.

If Plaintiff seeks to file an untimely opposition brief, he must submit a request to do so showing good cause for his failure to comply with the deadline required by the Local Rules, and must submit the proposed opposition brief along with the request. If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 14, 2022, the Court will grant Defendant's motion to dismiss as unopposed and/or dismiss Plaintiffs claims for failure to prosecute without further notice.

The Court VACATES the hearing on the motion to dismiss currently scheduled on January 24, 2022 and will reset it at a later date, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Forsyth v. United States
(Jan 3, 2021)