Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

ELIJAH LEE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. J. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 11, 2022, the court reviewed an affidavit in support of plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and found that plaintiff's prison trust account statement reflected that he had $2, 000.60 in available funds as of October 22, 2021, an amount sufficient to pre-pay the filing fees for this action. (ECF No. 5 at 1.) The court determined plaintiff had not made an adequate showing of indigency under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) to support his application to proceed in forma pauperis. See Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995); Alexander v. Carson Adult High Sch., 9 F.3d 1448, 1449 (9th Cir. 1993).

In the court's February 11, 2022 order, plaintiff was granted twenty (20) days to submit the appropriate filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to pay the fee would result in a recommendation that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that the present action be dismissed without prejudice. On February 24, 2022, the court re-served the February 11, 2022 order to plaintiff pursuant to a notice of change of address submitted in another case.

Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court's order. The undersigned will recommend the present action be dismissed without prejudice.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this case.

In addition, IT IS RECOMMENDED:

1. Plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied and this action be dismissed without prejudice to refiling upon pre-payment of the filing fee or an adequate showing of indigency under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

2. The Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty (20) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Miller v. Thomas
(Mar 25, 2022)