Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KEVIN STEVENS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: February 24, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cr-00073-RBS-LRL-2; 2:21-cv-00260-RBS)

Kevin Stevens, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 1

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Stevens, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requesting reconsideration of the court's order holding Stevens' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in abeyance. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Stevens seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED 2

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Stevens
(Mar 1, 2022)