Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LATISHA NICOLE TOLBERT, Plaintiff, v. SGT. CAZZOLLI et al., Defendants.

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge.

LATISHA NICOLE TOLBERT Plaintiff, Pro Se.

ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge.

On January 10, 2022, pro se plaintiff Latisha Nicole Tolbert (“plaintiff”) filed this action alleging that defendants violated her civil rights by falsely arresting her on June 26, 2020. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff also sought leave to proceed without pre-paying the filing fee (“IFP Application”). Dkt. No. 2

On February, 9, 2022, U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter granted plaintiff's IFP application for the purposes of filing. Dkt. No. 3. After conducting an initial review of the complaint, Judge Baxter advised by Report & Recommendation (“R&R”) that plaintiffs complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Id. As Judge Baxter explained, the exhibits attached to the pleading conclusively established that defendants possessed probable cause to arrest plaintiff on June 26, 2020. Id.

Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time period in which to do so has now expired. See Dkt. No. 4. Upon review for clear error, the R&R will be accepted and adopted in all respects. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Report & Recommendation is ACCEPTED; and

2. Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Tolbert v. Cazzolli
(Mar 1, 2022)