Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

L. TOOLASPRASHAD, Plaintiff, v. R. TOOLASPRASHAD, Defendant.

RACHEL P. KOVNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

RACHEL P. KOVNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pro se plaintiff L. Toolasprashad filed this action against defendant R. Toolasprashad under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). See Compl. 1 (Dkt. # 1). By Memorandum and Order dated October 25, 2021, the Court granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of the order. (Dkt. # 7). To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court's order, and the time for doing so has passed.

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this action.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Toolasprashad v. Toolasprashad
(Jan 3, 2022)