AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GILBERT P. HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FORINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Defendants-Appellees

Per Curiam

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:18-cv-00546-TSE-MSN, Judge T. S. Ellis, III.

Andrew M. Grossman, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Mark W. DeLaquil.

Peter John Sawert, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Jessica Aber, Thomas W. Krause, Robert J. McManus, Raj Parekh, Michael Tyler.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam

(Prost, Reyna, and Hughes, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hyatt v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
(Nov 3, 2021)