HON. C. STEPHEN HACKELING, J.D.C.
The Law Offices of Scott D. Gross, Esq. Attorneys for Petitioner
Burke & Burke, Esqs., PC Attorneys for Defendant
HON. C. STEPHEN HACKELING, J.D.C.
Upon the following papers numbered 1 thru 10
Read on this motion to strike
Notice of Motion and supporting papers 1-3
Answering Affidavits/Cross Motion and supporting papers 4-6
Affirmation in Opposition to Cross-Motion
Reply Affirmation and supporting papers 7
Filed papers: Hardship Declaration 8
Other Petition and Answer 9-10
Upon the foregoing cited papers, the Decision/Order on the motion is as follows:
The petitioner moves by application dated June 23, 2021 seeking to strike affirmative defenses and counterclaims detailed in the respondent's answer. The respondent cross moves seeking summary judgment dismissing the subject petitioner and asserts that, at a minimum, the Court is statutorily required to stay all matters until September 1, 2021.
The Emergency Moratorium Automatic Stay
The threshold issue advanced for disposition is whether the respondent's May 17, 2021 filing of a "Commercial Tenant Hardship Declaration" serves to unilaterally and automatically stay this summary eviction proceeding until after September 1, 2021.
The respondent argues that the "COVID-19 Emergency Protection Small Business Act", Chapter 381 laws of 2020; Chapter 73 of the laws of 2021 (hereafter "COVID Moratorium") as implemented by the Memorandum Order of the Chief Administrative Judge, dated May 24, 2021, requires no additional documentary proof to trigger its (moratorium) protection from eviction. The language of the statute provides "the submission of a declaration... shall act as a temporary stay applicable to all entities". The Chief Judge's memorandum advises that "those who submitted a Hardship Declaration... such proceedings are now stayed until August 31, 2021."