HOFFSTADT, J.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BA398731, William N. Sterling, Judge.
Law Offices of Jason Szydlik and Jason Szydlik for Defendant and Appellant.
Matthew Rodriquez, Acting Attorney General, Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Noah P. Hill and Thomas C. Hsieh, Deputy Attorneys General.
HOFFSTADT, J.
When part of a criminal sentence is ordered stricken by an appellate court, the trial court on remand “has jurisdiction to modify every aspect of the sentence” when resentencing. (People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857, 893 (Buycks).) But is a trial court conducting such a resentencing required to exercise that jurisdiction in order to correct a different part of the sentence that has become incorrect by the time of resentencing? We conclude that the answer is “yes.” Because the trial court in this case conducted a resentencing to correct one sentencing enhancement while letting stand another enhancement that had become incorrect, we reverse and remand for a plenary resentencing.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
I. Facts
In June 2012, Maurice Walker (defendant) stabbed a 77-year-old man with a knife.
II. Procedural Background
A. Charges, conviction and original sentencing