Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ANDRE JOHNSON v. MARCUS JONES

JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion To Dismiss Based On Qualified Immunity Or, Alternatively, For A Schultea Reply (Doc. 21). The Motion is opposed. (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report And Recommendation (Doc. 32) recommending that the Court deny Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, permit Plaintiff to amend his Complaint, and refer this matter back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 33).

Having carefully considered the underlying Complaint, the instant Motion, Plaintiff's Opposition, and related filings, the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is permitted to amend his Complaint within 21 days of the filing of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) is DENIED, without prejudice to refiling within 21 days of the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 1st day of February, 2021

/s/ _________

JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Johnson v. Jones
(Feb 1, 2021)