AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Vincent Del Grosso, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jimmy Jazz Staten Island, LLC, Defendant, General Growth Properties Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants. GGP Staten Island Initially Sued Herein as General Growth Properties, Inc. et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents,

Before: Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kern, Oing, Mendez, JJ.

The Altman Law Firm, PLLC, Woodmere (Michael T. Altman of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence, Worden, Rainis & Bard, P.C., Melville (Michael E. Shay of counsel), for General Growth Properties, Inc. and General Growth Services, Inc., respondents.

O'Connor Redd Orlando LLP, Port Chester (Lauren Creegan of counsel), for K & R Electric Company, Inc., respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered November 19, 2019, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of third-party defendant K&R Electric Company, Inc. (K&R) to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations for his substance abuse and mental health treatment records and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for a protective order precluding disclosure of those records, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleges that as a result of an accident in which an object fell on his head from above, he sustained, as relevant here, a traumatic brain injury with resulting cognitive impairments and experienced post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, mood swings, loss of sense of self, and anxiety, among other things. The motion court providently exercised its discretion when it directed disclosure of plaintiff's substance abuse and mental health treatment records. Plaintiff put his mental condition in issue such that the interests of justice significantly outweighed the need to maintain confidentiality of those records by alleging that he sustained cognitive and psychological injuries impairments (see Castro v Admar Supply Co., Inc., 159 AD3d 1616, 1619 [4th Dept 2018]; Rothstein v Huh, 60 AD3d 839, 839 [2d Dept 2009]; Rosen v MHM Realty LLC, 166 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2018]; see generally Mental Hygiene Law § 33.13[c][1]; cf. Del Terzo v Hospital for Special Surgery, 95 AD3d 551 [1st Dept 2012]; Gough v Panorama Windows Ltd., 133 AD3d 526 [1st Dept 2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 5, 2021

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Del Grosso v. Jimmy Jazz Staten Island, LLC
(Jan 5, 2021)