Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LOUIE GOHMERT; TYLER BOWYER; NANCY COTTLE; JAKE HOFFMAN; ANTHONY KERN; JAMES R. LAMON; SAM MOORHEAD; ROBERT MONTGOMERY; LORAINE PELLEGRINO; GREG SAFSTEN; KELLI WARD; MICHAEL WARD, Plaintiffs—Appellants, MARIAN SHERIDAN; MESHAWN MADDOCK; MARI-ANN HENRY; AMY FACCHINELLO; MICHELE LUNDGREN, Mo v. nts—Appellants,

PER CURIAM

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:20-CV-660 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5.4. --------

This administrative panel is presented with an emergency motion for expedited appeal. We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. That includes jurisdiction to determine both our and the district court's jurisdiction. We have the benefit of the briefing before the district court and its 13-page opinion styled Order of Dismissal, issued January 1, 2021. That order adopts the position of the Department of Justice, finding that the district court lacks jurisdiction because no plaintiff has the standing demanded by Article III. We need say no more, and we affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. We express no view on the underlying merits or on what putative party, if any, might have standing. The motion to expedite is dismissed as moot. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Gohmert v. Pence
(Jan 2, 2021)