AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JACOB ZACHARY KING v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

RULING

On or about July 30, 2020, the pro se Plaintiff, a person confined at the Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System in Jackson, Louisiana, filed a Complaint alleging a civil rights violation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff failed to submit his complaint on a proper form and failed to submit either the filing fee or a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with statement of account, so pursuant to correspondence dated August 4, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit his complaint on an approved form along with either the full filing fee or a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with statement of account within twenty-one (21) days and advised him that failure to do so would result in dismissal of his suit without further notice.

R. Doc. 1.

R. Doc. 2.

A review of the record by the Court reflects that Plaintiff has failed to properly respond to the Court's directives. Though Plaintiff submitted a new complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis is lacking the required statement of account. Plaintiff complains that requiring him to submit a statement of account is "superfluous and redundant," but pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Plaintiff is required to submit the statement of account, and this Court is required to base Plaintiff's initial filing fee off of in information provided in the statement of account. Without this required information, the suit cannot proceed. Because Plaintiff failed to properly respond to this Court's directives, his action shall be dismissed without prejudice for failure to correct the deficiencies of which he was notified. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned proceeding is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's deficient Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED AS MOOT.

R. Doc. 4. --------

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on September 1, 2020.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

King v. Louisiana
(Sep 1, 2020)