AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NELSON ISRAEL JUAREZ SOSA, Defendant.

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Nelson Israel Juarez Sosa's motion to proceed with a telephonic or video sentencing (Dkt. No. 77). Having considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the reasons explained herein.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 2, 2019, a grand jury indicted Juarez Sosa for possession of heroin with intent to distribute. (Dkt. No. 1 at 3.) On February 10, 2020, Juarez Sosa pleaded guilty. (Dkt. No. 49.) Juarez Sosa's in-person sentencing was originally set for April 28, 2020. (Id.) However, due to the COVID- 19 pandemic, the Court was forced to postpone Juarez Sosa's sentencing first to June 9, 2020, and subsequently to August 11, 2020. (Dkt. Nos. 63, 65.) Although Juarez Sosa's sentencing is currently set for August 11, that sentencing cannot take place in-person until at least September 8, 2020, because of the recent rise in COVID-19 cases in Washington. See W.D. Wash., General Order No. 11-20 at 1-2 (July 30, 2020). To avoid further delays, Juarez Sosa moves to have his sentencing proceed by video or telephonic conference. (Dkt. No. 77 at 2-3.)

For reasons unrelated to COVID-19, the Court must move Juarez Sosa's sentencing to August 20, 2020. --------

II. DISCUSSION

On March 30, 2020, Chief Judge Ricardo S. Martinez issued General Order 04-20, which states in relevant part,

The use of video conferencing or telephone conferencing for felony pleas under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and felony sentencings under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 is hereby authorized provided that the district judge in a particular case finds for specific reasons that the plea or sentencing in that case cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice. In cases that can be further delayed without such harm, the district judge should instead continue the sentencing or trial date.

W.D. Wash., General Order 04-20, at 2-3 (Mar. 30, 2020); see W.D. Wash., General Order 11-20, at 2 (July 30, 2020) (continuing General Order 04-20 through September 8, 2020).

Delaying Juarez Sosa's sentencing would cause serious harm to the interests of justice in this case. Under General Order 11-20, in-person criminal hearings in the Seattle Courthouse of the Western District of Washington will not resume until at least September 8, 2020. General Order 11-20, at 2. Thus, absent the Court's intervention, Juarez Sosa cannot be sentenced in person until at least September 8, 2020, despite having pleaded guilty over five months ago. (Dkt. No. 49.) Juarez Sosa will be prejudiced if his sentencing is delayed until in-person hearings resume, as he plans to ask for a time-served sentence and has an interest in the speedy resolution of this matter. (See Dkt. No. 77 at 2.) The Court therefore FINDS that Juarez Sosa's sentencing "cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice." W.D. Wash., General Order 04-20, at 2-3 (Mar. 30, 2020).

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Juarez Sosa's motion to proceed with a telephonic or video sentencing (Dkt. No. 77). Juarez Sosa's remote sentencing will occur on August 20, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.

DATED this 2nd day of August 2020.

/s/_________

John C. Coughenour

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Juarez Sosa
(Aug 2, 2020)