Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYLER ROMINE

David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

In Bluefield, on August 3, 2020, came the defendant, Tyler Romine, in person and by counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender; came the United States by John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney; and came United States Probation Officer Kachine Jonese, for a hearing on the petition to revoke the defendant's term of supervised release.

The court informed the defendant of the alleged violations contained in the petition to revoke the term of supervised release, filed on June 25, 2020. The court found that the defendant had received written notice of the alleged violation as contained in the petition and that the evidence against the defendant had been disclosed. The court advised the defendant that, pursuant to Rule 32.1(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, he has the right to a hearing and assistance of counsel before his term of supervised release could be revoked. Defendant did not contest that the government would be able to prove the charges by a preponderance of the evidence. Whereupon the court found that the charges were established by a preponderance of the evidence.

The court found that the Guideline imprisonment range for the revocation of supervised release upon such grounds was seven to thirteen months. The court further found that the Guideline ranges issued by the Sentencing Commission with respect to revocation of probation and supervised release are policy statements only and are not binding on the court. Thus, the court stated that the relevant statutory provision is 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3), which provides a maximum term of imprisonment of twenty-four months. Neither party objected to the Guideline range and statutory penalty as determined by the court.

After giving counsel for both parties and defendant an opportunity to speak regarding the matter of disposition, the court ORDERED, pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, that the defendant's term of supervised release be revoked, and he is sentenced to time served. Upon release from imprisonment, defendant will serve a term of supervised release of thirty-four (34) months. While on supervised release, defendant shall not commit another federal, state or local crime, and shall be subject to the Standard Conditions of Supervision adopted by this court. All previously imposed conditions of supervision remain in effect. Defendant is directed to report to the United States Probation Office in the Middle District of Florida no later than August 7, 2020. Finally, the court reimposed the unpaid portion of defendant's special assessment of $100.00.

In considering the proper term of imprisonment to be imposed, the court considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), (a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7), as well as the Chapter 7 policy statements and concluded that the sentence imposed is an appropriate sanction for the defendant's breach of trust, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. The court further concluded that the sentence imposed will provide adequate deterrence to criminal conduct and protect the public from further crimes of the defendant.

The defendant was informed of his right to appeal the court's findings and the revocation of his supervised release. The defendant was further informed that in order to initiate such an appeal, a Notice of Appeal must be filed in this court within fourteen (14) days. The defendant was advised that if he wishes to appeal and cannot afford to hire counsel to represent him on appeal, the court will appoint counsel for him. The defendant was further advised that if he so requests, the Clerk of court will prepare and file a notice of appeal on his behalf.

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record, the United States Marshal for the Southern District of West Virginia, and the Probation Department of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of August, 2020.

ENTER:

/s/_________

David A. Faber

Senior United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Romine
(Aug 3, 2020)