Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SEAN PIATT, Defendant.

Tim A. Baker United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of Indiana

- 01

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On July 1, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the Petitions for Warrant or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on June 12, and 25, 2020. Defendant Piatt appeared in person with his appointed counsel Joseph Cleary. The government appeared by Cindy Cho, Assistant United States Attorney. U. S. Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Ryan Sharp.

The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:

1. The Court advised Defendant Piatt of his rights and provided him with a copy of the petition. Defendant Piatt orally waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

2. After being placed under oath, Defendant Piatt admitted violations 1, 2, 3, and 4. [Docket Nos. 83 and 86.]

3. The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the petition, are:

ViolationNumber

Nature of Noncompliance

1

"You shall participate in a program for sexual disorders, includingperiodic polygraph examinations, as directed by the probation officer.The treatment provider should determine the type and timing of suchpolygraph examinations. The court authorizes the release of thepresentence report and available psychological evaluations to thetreatment provider, as approved by the probation officer."On June 5, 2020, Mr. Piatt began his third attempt of supervised release.On June 8, 2020, this officer met with him to review his conditions ofsupervision and attempted to refer him to sex offender treatment. Herefused to attend sex offender treatment. He was given a few days to thinkit over, and this officer recommended he consult with the federaldefender's office. On June 12, 2020, this officer gave him anotheropportunity to agree to sex offender treatment. He again refused. Herefuses to speak with the federal defender's office about this matter andadvised he wants a violation hearing to explain his reasoning.

2

"You shall reside in a residential reentry center for a term of 180 days.You shall abide by the rules and regulations of the facility."On June 5, 2020, Mr. Piatt was released from BOP custody in Marion,Illinois, and provided instructions to report to the Volunteers of America(VOA) in Indianapolis the same day. He did not arrive until 12:20 p.m. onJune 6, 2020.On June 17, 2020, Mr. Piatt received an incident report for refusing ordersas he would not wear a face mask. This is a facility rule that is required foreveryone, residents and staff.

3

"You shall refrain from any unlawful use of a controlled substance."On June 6, 2020, when Mr. Piatt first arrived at the VOA, a baseline drugscreen was collected. The results were positive for marijuana and cocaine.He denies using either drug.

4

"You shall not use or possess alcohol."On June 6, 2020, when Mr. Piatt first arrived at the VOA, a baseline drugscreen collected. The results were positive for alcohol. He denies drinkingalcohol.

4. The parties stipulated that:

(a) The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation.

(b) Defendant's criminal history category is III.

(c) The range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation of supervised release, therefore, is 8 to 14 months' imprisonment.





5. The government argued for a sentence of twenty-four (24) months with no supervised release or a sentencing of fourteen (14) months with six (6) years of supervised release to follow. Defendant argued for a sentence less than government's recommendations with no supervised release to follow.

The Magistrate Judge, having considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that his supervised release should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General or his designee for a period of eight months with no supervised release to follow. The Defendant is to be taken into custody immediately pending the District Judge's action on this Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge will make a recommendation of placement at a medical facility with mental health treatment.

The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties have fourteen days after being served a copy of this Report and Recommendation to serve and file written objections with the District Judge.

Dated: 7/1/2020

/s/_________

Tim A. Baker

United States Magistrate Judge

Southern District of Indiana Distribution: All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court's ECF system

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Piatt
(Jul 1, 2020)