AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DEWAYNE BAKER, Plaintiff, v. KING, et al., Defendants.

By: Michael F. Urbanski Chief United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff DeWayne Baker, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By conditional filing orders entered December 3, 2019 and March 2, 2020, the court advised Baker that he must notify the court immediately in writing upon his transfer or release and must provide the court with a new address. See ECF Nos. 3 and 15. By order entered April 13, 2020, the court denied Baker's motion to amend. See ECF No. 20. On April 28, 2020, that order was returned to the court as undeliverable and with no forwarding address. See ECF No. 21. Baker has not provided the court with an updated address and, therefore, the court has no means of contacting him. Accordingly, the court will dismiss Baker's complaint without prejudice. Baker is advised that he may refile his claims in a separate action, subject to the applicable statute of limitations.

ENTER: This 1st day of May, 2020.

/s/_________

Michael F. Urbanski

Chief United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Baker v. King
(May 1, 2020)