Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PHILLIP W., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Social Security Administration Commissioner, Defendant.

Jon D. Levy CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 24) with the Court on January 7, 2020, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(3) (West 2020) and D. Me. Local R. 72, regarding Plaintiff Phillip W.'s request that the Court review the Social Security Administration Commissioner's final administrative decision on his application for supplemental income benefits (ECF Nos. 1, 11). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge provided notice that a party's failure to object would waive the right to de novo review and appeal.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 24) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED. The administrative decision is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.

Dated this 1st day of April, 2020.

/s/ Jon D. Levy

CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Phillip W. v. Saul
(Apr 1, 2020)