Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

BAHR v. O'NATE et al.

4 F.Supp. 776 (N.D.Cal. 1928) BAHR v. O'NATE et al. No. 1999. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 1, 1928

        Clarence W. Morris, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

        Joseph T. Curley and Marvin C. Hix, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant Andrew O'Nate.

        BOURQUIN, District Judge.

        This patent (U.S. No. 1,582,500) infringement suit is of trifling importance. But in one respect it is unique if not a scintillating gem.

        For the evidence was presented and the cause argued all in less than 30 minutes. The evidence is scanty, though like Mercutio's wound, 'twill serve,' disclosing that in 1925 O'Nate made at least one appliance like that patented.

        No question is made of equitable jurisdiction or validity of the patent. Accordingly, the court finds for plaintiff, who may have a reference for an accounting, if deemed worth while.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bahr v. O'Nate
(May 1, 1928)