Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

McGrath v. Warks&sCo.

41 F.Supp. 18 (E.D.Pa. 1941) McGRATH v. WARKs&sCO., Inc. Civ. A. No. 1469. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Oct. 9, 1941

        Felix & Felix, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

        Francis Logan, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

        KALODNER, District Judge.

        The motion to dismiss must be granted.

        The case of Swartz v. Conradis, 298 Pa. 343, 148 A. 529, is dispositive of the issue. See also Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Company, 317 Pa. 557, 177 A. 25; Billo v. Allegheny Steel Company, 328 Pa. 97, 195 A. 110.

        The plaintiff, who was employed by a subcontractor, is seeking to recover damages from the general contractor, for injuries suffered in the course of his employment.

        The accident occurred in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania law applies. Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McGrath v. Warks&sCo.
(Oct 9, 1941)