Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MORRIS v. WM. J. DUGGAN CO.

          FORD, District Judge.

         It appearing that Cornelius D. Duggan has already answered interrogatories proposed to him by the plaintiff, the motion, insofar as it relates to this subject, is denied. I see no reason for compelling any further answers.

          In the plaintiff's motion to admit facts and documents, he designates no time within which the admissions should be made as required by Rule 36, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. If he amends his request in this regard and designates the time within which the admissions are requested, the defendant-if, of course, he cares to do so-will either deny, under oath, specifically the matters of which the admissions are requested or set forth in detail the reasons why he cannot truthfully admit or deny those matters. Rule 36, F.R.C.P.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Morris v. Wm. J. Duggan Co.
(Nov 3, 1942)