Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STIDHAM v. SWOPE, Warden.

83 F.Supp. 371 (9th.Cir. 1949) STIDHAM v. SWOPE, Warden. No. 28768H. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 6, 1949

        James William Stidham, in pro. per.

        Before the Honorable William Denman, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

        DENMAN, Chief Judge.

        Stidham has presented to me his third application for a writ of habeas corpus. It contains the 'new ground' for relief required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244, a ground not stated in his prior applications. The third application states the requirements necessary to present it to a circuit judge. Cf. my opinion on his second application to me in Stidham v. Swope, D.C.N.D. Cal., 83 F.Supp. 370.

        I am soon to leave for a session of the United States Court of Appeals in Los Angeles and will be unable to give the application the expeditious consideration required in habeas corpus proceedings and hence, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241(b), I am declining to entertain it.

        The application is ordered transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Stidham v. Swope
(Apr 6, 1949)