Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Tancredi PAOLINO v. UNCAS MFG. CO

CAPOTOSTO, J.

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled case, pursuant to our opinion heretofore filed, 82 A.2d 878, the plaintiff through his attorney appeared to show cause why the case should not be remitted to the superior court for entry of judgment for the defendant as therein directed. At that itme he presented reasons in support of his contention that the verdict should be sustained.

Upon consideration we are of the opinion that no sufficient cause has been shown to change our conclusion as to the narrow issue therein presented and decided, and the case is remitted to the superior court for entry of judgment for the defendant as directed in the opinion

CAPOTOSTO, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Paolino v. Uncas Mfg. Co
(Oct 26, 1951)