Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Guy Frederick SOMERS, Defendant.

322 F.Supp. 31 (E.D.Wis. 1971) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Guy Frederick SOMERS, Defendant. No. 70-CR-162. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. Jan. 11, 1971

        David J. Cannon, U.S. Atty. by Terry Mitchell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

        Risser & Risser by Thomas C. Eckerle, Madison, Wis., for defendant.         DECISION and ORDER

        MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

        The defendant has moved for a change of venue, asking that the case be transferred to the western district of Wisconsin.

        The defendant points out that the western district is the place of residence of the defendant, his attorney, and the witnesses to be called by the defendant at the trial. The government, on the other hand, notes that there are fewer pending criminal cases in the eastern district than in the western district.

        Although the defendant resides in Madison, Wisconsin, it is my opinion that this is not an impressive reason for a change of venue. The distance between Madison and Milwaukee is not so great that travel between the two cities is burdensome. In my opinion, the proper exercise of discretion is to deny the application for a change of venue. See Spaulding v. United States, 279 F.2d 65 (9th Cir. 1969).

        Now, therefore, it is ordered that the defendant' motion for a change of venue be and hereby is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Somers
(Jan 11, 1971)