Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LLUVIA SELENE REYES

SUSAN K. LEE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on February 27, 2020. At the hearing, defendant moved to withdraw her not guilty plea to Count One and Count Four of the seven-count Indictment and entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B), and to Count Four in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement [Doc. 81]. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find the defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; the plea is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

Therefore, I RECOMMEND defendant's motion to withdraw her not guilty plea to Count One and Count Four of the Indictment be granted, her plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B), and to Count Four in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement be accepted, the Court adjudicate defendant guilty to the lesser included offense of the charge in Count One, that is of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 5 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual) and 50 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 841(b)(1)(B), and to Count Four in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement, and a decision on whether to accept the plea agreement be deferred until sentencing. Defendant filed a motion to remain on bond after entry of her plea pending sentencing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3143(a) & 3145(c) [Doc. 84]. The government did not oppose the motion. I find exceptional reasons are present in this matter. Therefore, Defendant's motion to remain on bond pending sentencing [Doc. 84] is GRANTED and a separate Order has been entered on the record. I further RECOMMEND Defendant remain on bond until sentencing in this matter. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

/s/_________

SUSAN K. LEE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than fourteen days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Reyes
(Mar 2, 2020)