Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re Marion Douglas DORN, Jr., Debtor.

54 B.R. 654 (Bkrtcy.D.S.C. 1985) In re Marion Douglas DORN, Jr., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 84-01001. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina. July 12, 1985

Page 655.

        James E. Chellis, Chellis & Mortimer, P.A., Summerville, S.C., for debtor.

        Betsy Burke, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for I.R.S.

        ORDER

        J. BRATTON DAVIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

        Before the court is a motion of the debtor to disallow certain penalties imposed under Section 6651 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. § 101et seq. )), as shown on proof of claim for internal revenue taxes filed on behalf of the United States (Proof of Claim No. 3. As stipulated by the parties, the issue is whether the failure of the debtor to file and to pay timely (because of an alleged drug related illness) federal income taxes for the years 1979, 1980 and 1981 was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.

        The court hereby denies the debtor's motion seeking to avoid the negligence penalties at issue incurred under 26 U.S.C. § 6651 for the reason the debtor has failed to meet his burden of proof. The debtor has failed to show that he is entitled to avoid the imposed negligence penalties on the basis of a drug-related illness--the evidence shows that he was able to work, to earn substantial sums of money and to perform other routine activities during the relevant times.

        ACCORDINGLY, the debtor's motion to disallow the negligence penalty assessed by the Internal Revenue Service as shown on Proof of Claim No. 3 filed on behalf of the United States totaling $25,092.34 is hereby denied and the proof of claim is allowed as filed.

        AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Dorn
(Jul 12, 1985)